Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Wow.... Yeah, Wow

So, to recap the last few days:

  • A police officer said to a non-compliant Asian student “Have you had too much sake tonight?”

  • Our best lead photo of the year on a fantastic story with a Washington D.C. dateline.

  • A couple of fantastically-reported stories about some sketchiness going on regarding Collegeboxes.

  • A friggin' nine story issue!

  • A flood in Carman?!?!?!

  • A link from the Wall Street Journal for our coverage of Michael Mukasey's expected (since-actualized) nomination of former Spectator Editorial Page Editor Michael Mukasey to the Attorney Generalship.

  • And, just when we thought it was all over, Minutemen!


Going on almost no sleep, I have very few coherent thoughts on these events, but the one thing that I want to emphasize is how important new writers have been to the whole thing. Of course, Josh Chambers, Monica Varman, and Sarah Cohler had bylines. Beyond that, three first-years have been scouring through the archives for old pieces done under Mukasey's board. Further, their energy and excitement is freeing up some of the more-senior writers to finally write analysis pieces that they have been working on for months.

The only other thing I would add is that news is unpredictable, and as such, I have spent an inordinate number of nights in this office well past four, and I would never trade this experience for anything. (If you want to know why, just look at our front page this morning.) But if we do end up talking to you about a late-breaking news story, it's really nice when you are generally pleasant and call as early as possible as the people we talked to tonight did.

Sleep.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

could you comment on the coverage of the nadia abu el-haj controversy from the side of the spec? there is an interesting discussion in the comments section of the bwog over the differences between the Spec's and the Bwog's coverage of the Alan Segal lecture. http://www.bwog.net/index.php

Anonymous said...

yes, and also the fact that the nyt story was far more comprehensive than spec's... yes, they're professionals, but they cover columbia rarely enough that spec should be beating them on columbia stories. this one was not even close.